Research Collections

Review basis: Publisher abstract and author notes.

The publisher abstract reports MATLAB/Simulink evaluation and a hardware model. Its author notes credit Alqudaihi with the 3-D-printed cover and laboratory work. The full article was not accessible in this review; commercial deployment is not established.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Publisher abstract, highlights and author contribution notes; full-text access returned an error.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Publisher abstract and author notes.

The publisher abstract reports a Python implementation evaluated on emulations of differential and harmonic protection algorithms. This supports a computational application, not installation in an operating substation. The full article was not accessible in this review.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Publisher abstract and published author list; full-text access returned an error.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The publisher abstract and Section 3 describe MATLAB/Simulink models and performance comparisons. This article is classified on its simulation evidence; the hardware described in the related dissertation is not attributed to this paper.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Publisher abstract; Section 3, Simulation Results and Discussion; Figures 7–13 and Tables 2–3.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The author-uploaded full paper describes a Cyclone IV FPGA implementation. Section IV compares benchmark filters and reports logic depth, operators, area, memory and delay. This is architecture evaluation, not evidence of field deployment.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Author-uploaded full paper: first-page author list; implementation description; Section IV, Tables III–VI.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Section 6.2 identifies temperature datasets from three university systems and describes model evaluation in MATLAB. This supports evaluation with operational-system data, not proof that a new controller was installed at those sites.

Zohdy is named as committee chair. The acknowledgments also credit Christopher J. Kobus and the other committee members; their contribution is not attributed solely to one person.

Other committee members Christopher J. Kobus; Daniel N. Aloi; Richard Olawoyin; Darrell P. Schmidt. Committee membership is shown separately from authorship.

• Dissertation and data description ↗Section 6.2, printed p. 81; title page and acknowledgments, p. iv.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Sections 3.2–3.3 use HOMER Pro to compare proposed configurations. The model is informed by the campus energy setting, but the paper does not establish installation of the proposed hybrid systems.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Sections 3.2–3.3, Table 3 and conclusion; author list on first page.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Sections 2–3 define the system and compare controller responses under changing reference signals. The reviewed results concern the modeled system; a physical installation is not inferred.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Full article: Sections 2–3, Tables 1–2 and Figures 4–10.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Sections 4.4 and 5.1 describe a publicly obtained dataset from a shoe manufacturer in Indonesia, with more than 409,000 records and 482 suppliers. Model evaluation on industrial data is documented; operational adoption by a manufacturer is not established.

The title page identifies Zohdy as chair and Olawoyin as co-chair. The acknowledgments credit guidance from Zohdy and early direction from Olawoyin. These are author-reported acknowledgments.

Other committee members William Edwards; Erica Ruegg. Committee membership is shown separately from authorship.

• Dissertation and dataset description ↗Sections 4.4 and 5.1, printed pp. 62–63; acknowledgments, p. iv.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Section 4.4.3 describes an Arduino Mega 2560 controller, a buck-boost circuit built on a breadboard, feedback measurements and oscilloscope outputs. This supports laboratory application, not commercial deployment.

Zohdy is named as doctoral committee chair on the title page. Specific comments and decision sequences are not reconstructed from the dissertation.

Other committee members Subramaniam Ganesan; Gary Barber; Li Li. Committee membership is shown separately from authorship.

• Dissertation and experiment ↗Section 4.4.3, printed pp. 73–77; PDF pp. 86–90.

Review basis: Publisher abstract; related dissertation experiment checked separately.

The publisher abstract specifies the practical converter problem and proposed control approach. The related 2022 dissertation documents a laboratory implementation; this entry does not assume that every dissertation experiment appears in the article.

• Publisher record and abstract ↗Abstract; DOI 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3113299.
• Related dissertation experiment ↗Section 4.4.3.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The author-shared accepted manuscript develops an adaptive MPC vehicle model, generates driving scenarios and injects faults in MATLAB/Simulink. The test environment is virtual; road testing is not established.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Accepted manuscript: Sections II–III, driving scenarios and fault-injection results, Figures 3–9.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Section 3.1 identifies three institutional datasets, including Oakland facilities measurements of temperature and water flow. This is model testing with real measurements, not evidence of deployment in campus control operations.

The published contribution statement credits supervision and writing review/editing to Zohdy; conceptualization, methodology and software to Salhein; investigation to Ashraf. Role labels do not reconstruct seminar exchanges.

• Publisher full text ↗Section 3.1; Author Contributions; Data Availability Statement. DOI 10.3390/en14165075.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Sections 3–4 define a production-allocation problem and compare a Firefly implementation with Lindo; the forecasting subsection uses historical demand. The paper does not establish the author’s executive role or adoption by the company. Classification identifies application context, not validation of all reported numerical conclusions.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Sections 3–4; Demand Forecasting subsection; author affiliation and author list.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The article describes a small Oakland student GPA/course-grade dataset and compares clustering before and after scaling. It proposes follow-up learning plans; a measured improvement in students’ subsequent outcomes is not established.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Results, Figures 2–6; Section 4 description of dataset and procedure.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The abstract specifies NS-2 and SUMO simulation with AODV routing. A geographically grounded traffic scenario is distinguished from an attack experiment on public roads.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Abstract and simulation/performance sections.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The publisher abstract expressly identifies MATLAB and NetSim simulations of greenhouse sensing protocols. Ministry affiliation is listed, but an executive role in this project is not documented; only the applied category is assigned.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Abstract, author affiliations and simulation/results sections.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The abstract and methods describe human EEG data, preprocessing and analysis in EEGLAB and MATLAB. The paper discusses possible use for smart prosthetics; it does not establish a deployed prosthetic device or clinical effectiveness.

The acknowledgments identify Zohdy as adviser and credit guidance in formulating the paper. This is an explicit author acknowledgment, not independent observation of supervision.

• Publisher PDF ↗Abstract; methods, printed pp. 129–130; acknowledgments, p. 133.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Section 8 simulates a 100 m by 100 m network in MATLAB and compares Kalman filtering, linear prediction and centroid localization. No physical jammer-localization trial is asserted.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Section 8.1, Simulation Environment, and Section 8.2, Results.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Section 4 uses MATLAB to compare sensing schemes for 25- and 30-greenhouse network scenarios. These are simulations; a physical greenhouse deployment is not inferred.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Section 4, Simulation Results and Discussion, and Table 1.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The abstract and case-study results describe an enhanced genetic algorithm constrained by load and reliability, compared with standard GA and brute force. These are sizing calculations; construction of the proposed microgrid is not established.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Full article: abstract and case study/results; published author order on first page.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Section 6 reports a Mosquitto broker experiment comparing CPU utilization with and without TLS. The conclusion explicitly places large-scale real-world parking implementation in future work.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Section 6, Performance Analysis, Table 1; conclusion on future prototype deployment.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Publisher abstract and bibliographic record.

The publisher abstract describes a proposed sensor-network architecture, stochastic approximation, Kalman filtering and comparison with Michigan government data. It does not establish installation of a sensor network in Flint.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Publisher abstract and author list; Water Pollution XIV, pp. 277–283.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Section 5 describes outdoor driving experiments, a smartphone mobile station and measured signal data used to assess Kalman estimators. This is field measurement rather than simulation alone.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Section 5, Outdoor Experiments; Section 5.1, Measurements.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The abstract and simulation sections evaluate power-flow behavior under operating scenarios. The work is included as applied modeling, not as evidence of a commissioned residential installation.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Abstract; modeling and simulation sections; first-page author list.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The measurement setup and conclusion describe three indoor scenarios and comparison of measured distributions with theoretical models. This supports an experimentally evaluated practical communications problem.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Measurement setup and Figures 11–12; Section 6, Conclusion.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The article develops component and complete-system models for a residential energy application. Its modeling contribution supports inclusion; installation or measured household savings are not asserted.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Abstract; component-modeling sections and conclusion.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

The abstract and real-data experiment describe laboratory measurements supporting comparison with a first-order estimator. This does not establish adoption in a commercial network.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Abstract and real-data experiment; Figure 9 laboratory setup.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Section 3 describes experimental motor-parameter determination; Sections 4–5 compare control methods in a simulated drive. Measured parameters are distinguished from a physical test of the complete controller.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Section 3, Experimental Determination of Motor Parameters; Sections 4–5.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.

Review basis: Relevant full-text sections.

Section 5 evaluates single and parallel converter configurations in simulation, including shifted switching. The figures identify Simulink models; physical converter deployment is not inferred.

Classification concerns this publication. Prior collaboration or doctoral affiliation does not establish who directed this particular work.

• Reviewed source ↗Section 5, Results; Figures 4–6 and simulation comparisons.
• DOI record ↗Permanent bibliographic identifier.